Hi Kim:
Happiness comes and goes, but contentment is permanent.
Yes, I live in the USA. You remark on a subject for which I am passionate.
Some Marseilles Tarot decks are
now in the stores here in the USA, but as you said Americans and Brits are attached (for now) to the Rider-Waite and Thoth decks. But, I have always maintained that it's not "their" fault. I say "their" in regards to my American brethren, because I broke from that Tarot pack many, many moons ago when I was a teenager, and I chose to read with the Marseille Tarot; indeed, I copied my own TdM from a library book when I first decided to read Tarot. There was an authenticity there that was palpable and undeniable. But, I was a highly curious young man, and the only decks and books available at a bookstore were the RWS and Crowley (mostly, RWS), and there was no Internet. So, I felt very isolated and stuck and deeply dissatisfied with those decks. Not even the Swiss 1JJ was readily available in my part of America. I remember reading at the Renaissance Faires and everyone had the RWS or a pretty clone. I was rather tactless then-- with the naïve audacity that comes with youth-- and I remarked to a few that their decks were anachronistic, I said that at least my (hand drawn) deck fit with the Time. Of course, once again, they were consuming what was available, plain and simple.
Back to the story on attachment...Arthur Edward Waite (an American-born Brit, or a British-born American, I can't remember which at this moment) made his Tarot with Pamela Coleman Smith the artist, and that deck became the prototype for all subsequent clones in the West. Then, all English books
wrote to the deck, so to speak. Stuart Kaplan of the company US Games Inc. published by far most of the Tarots at that time. He was interestingly enough, inspired in the beginning by the Swiss 1JJ deck, which has many more Marseille qualities to it, than RWS.
Swiss 1JJ-Kaplan's inspiration
Moreover, Kaplan has written encyclopedic tomes on the Tarot with wonderful illustratations of a wide array of TdM's and has quite a collection. Notwithstanding, the US Games Company really only published decks that were clones of the RWS or Crowley. So, this becomes a snake eating its own tail: As they only wanted to publish decks that the public knew and would conceivably sell, ironically they had the primary part in controlling what the Tarot public saw, and so they perpetuated the stranglehold. The meanings of the RWS/Crowley Minors, especially, were based on the Golden Dawn system and the astrological decans (as the Golden Dawen interpreted the decans). So, at least for the US Games decks and books, the publisher wanted only decks and books that perpetuated the RWS/Crowley meanings. You can perhaps see how this forces a brand to become ubiquitous. Since then, the Italian company Lo Scarabeo has branched out to TdM's, but still tends to publish a dizzying array of RWS/Crowley clones.
This is now changing, as the Marseille decks are being published by companies again and penetrating the market here in the US. But, still, there are very few English-language books on how to read with the Marseille more than it being presented as a "primitive" version of the RWS or Crowley decks. Due to the cartoon imagery on the RWS Minor Arcana, Americans/Brits are more attached to their Minor Arcana, so this becomes an obstacle when dealing with pips. As you know, in Europe, the Major Arcana plays, well...a more major role in the reading. Today, there are English-speaking Tarot forums that are discussing the Marseille deck and how to interpret it, using historical analysis, number symbolism, and other ideas, as well as analyzing Jodorowsky's work-- and the Internet, itself, has brought much to the light of day.
Well, I've rambled enough
. My basic point is that I believe that there is plenty of interest in the Marseille here. Like any "movement" it starts with a passionate coterie of dedicated folks.
Best,