Helo all:
I have a Method question; any input would be helpful.
When we ask “futurology” questions, “will such and such happen,” of course such questions are passive. When the first row of cards are upright and confirm the answer by the imagery or meaning of the card, in the Future position, then we may often say “Yes, such and such will happen.” But, sometimes, that last card (Future) is reversed, and a solution card and perhaps other gaze-cards following those regards follow.
It seems to me that the answer is sometimes, “No…and here’s the advised response”. But, I’ve seen readings where the answer is, "Not exactly (reversed card in the Future)…and here’s how it develops”.
Has anyone appreciated this? And, what’s been your experience telling the difference between No and Not Exactly.
One of my teachers who taught me the method said that generally with Futurology questions, we pay special attention to the first row, but we are not religious about this of course. In other words, our desired future may happen after we solve some problems. Generally, a reversed card in the Future position indicates some problem, which may only be a delay or caution. I guess I bring this up, because at times, the Future position card is reversed, indicating No, and it would seem rather easy (too easy ) to then see our desired future in the solution cards, rather than those solution cards being the advised response to the undesired future. Did I make any sense?
Thoughts?
Best regards,
Paul